WHO IS HOLDING THE CAMERA?

Radiology technician qualifications state by state.  Vary from, fogging mirror with your breath, to strict certifications... 

 No way for the public to know, and they are certainly not told.American Association of Radiology Technologists

Misdiagnosis is Pervasive in Healthcare and Radiology is Part of the Problem 
Imaging touches nearly every patient and disease category at hospitals today and is a big part of the diagnostic process. And despite its critical role in the patient care continuum, radiology lags substantially behind other healthcare practices in terms of quality standards 

2013 North Carolina is one of five states with no radiologic technologist licensure requirements, but Brenda Greenberg, RT(R)(CT), chair of the North Carolina Society of Radiologic Technologists (NCSRT) board of directors, intends to make a change.

Most of the larger North Carolina teaching hospitals have registered technologists on staff, a situation that Greenberg says is mostly due to reimbursement requirements. 
“However, if you go to specialty clinics such as chiropractic, podiatry, or even dental offices, you don’t know if that person has a consistent educational background, or any clinical competencies whatsoever,” she says. “In many places, they have secretaries taking these images.” 


2015, diagnosis huge problem, radiology huge problem... hodgepodge of qualifications for radiology healthcare providers~?
This is just intentional stupidity 

DUKE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL COVER-UP?

We all remember the 60 Minutes scandal over falsified cancer research dubbed "The largest scandal ever". But now there is more to the story.. a high ranking cover-up



Jan 9 2005  link to story Duke Officials Silenced Med Student  Who Reported Trouble in Anil Potti's Lab

Documents obtained by The Cancer Letter show that Duke’s deans were warned about Potti’s misconduct in late March and early April 2008, at the time when clinical trials of the now discredited Duke genomic technology were getting started.

The three-page document was penned by Bradford Perez, then a third-year medical student and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute scholar.
The Perez memo and internal emails that are being published here for the first time directly contradict the claims made by Duke officials that they had received no whistleblower reports.

Duke officials said they were blindsided by the events that reached a crescendo in 2010, more than two years after the Perez memo, following The Cancer Letter’s reporting that Potti had misrepresented his credentials, claiming, among other things, to have been a Rhodes Scholar (The Cancer Letter, July 16, 2010).

The medical student’s memo, titled Research Concerns, is a key element in a lawsuit filed on behalf of the patients who were enrolled in the three Duke clinical trials testing the discoveries from the program run by Nevins and Potti. Altogether, 117 patients were enrolled in the trials.

In addition to claiming harm, the patients’ lawsuit alleges that Duke officials engaged in a civil conspiracy. The case is expected to go to trial at the Durham County Superior Court on Jan. 26..